Fetal Heartbeats, Civil Enforcement and Standing Under the Texas Constitution

In his article, Professor Ari Gabinet argues that the issue of plaintiff’s standing to bring suit in state court may be central to countering the recent Texas abortion statue. Professor Gabinet explores how a recent Supreme Court decision, Transunion LLC. v. Ramirez, limits the use of private causes of action, the avenue created by the Texas legislature to curtail abortions.


Read More
The Constitutionality of Torture: An Unresolved Controversy

The Framers curiously left the word “torture” out of the written Constitution. Consequently, a fervent legal debate over the enigmatic meaning of the Eighth Amendment continues to rage on. This article outlines some cogent arguments both for and against the constitutionality of torture and concludes with a realistic policy compromise inspired by act utilitarianism ethical theory.

Read More
President Biden on Immigration: Creating Hope for Rhode Island Immigrants or a Continuation of the "Deporter-In-Chief" Persona?

As President Joe Biden has settled into his first 100 days in office, Rhode Island immigrants and immigrants’ rights advocates have expressed excitement over the Biden Administration’s push to reverse immigration policies enacted under the Trump Administration. This excitement could soon be tempered, however, as Biden advocates for policies that may more closely align him with the “Deporter-in-Chief” persona of his predecessors.

Read More
Legislation Trailing Advances in Health Research in Consumer Tech

Mobile devices, and consumer technology generally, is becoming the next platform for clinical research, but it is associated with increased risks and liability for participants. This technology includes smartphones and wearable devices that have the ability to track health metrics. Consequently, relevant legislation must increase in scope and magnitude to ensure the security and privacy of patient data on consumer technology platforms that are continuously evolving.

Read More
All Eyes on Georgia: Court-Packing and a Different “Switch in Time”

Complicated by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the 2020 election cycle incited consternation over the fate of the Supreme Court on both sides of the aisle. Calls to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court have encouraged increased attention upon the results of the run-off Senate elections in Georgia, as well as the historic attempt made by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to “pack the court” amid the crisis of the Great Depression.

Read More
The Establishment Clause in the Age of 10 Person Gatherings

As Amy Coney-Barrett settles into her role as Supreme Court Justice in place of the late Justice Ginsberg, much is at stake. The reliable 5-4 majority that Ginsberg often secured for the more liberal Justices, is now far from certain. One of the areas up for renegotiation is the way in which the Court approaches religious cases. The introduction of Amy Coney-Barrett means that the court will be likely in favor of religious institutions over secular businesses.

Read More
Don't Burn this Flag: Debunking Free Speech Hypocrisy

Nothing repulses a veteran more than the sight of a burning American flag, and understandably so. The flag represents the unrivaled freedom that brave men and women continue to sacrifice their lives for. In light of the American flag’s profound significance, this article discusses whether or not it ought to remain constitutional to publicly deface our country’s most sacred symbol.

Read More
The Mandalorian Meets the Law: Modern-day American Bounty Hunting

Last year, while watching the popular TV show “The Mandalorian,” I found myself intrigued with the show’s portrayal of “Mando,” a tough, resolute bounty hunter. In this article, I will explain what a modern-day American bounty hunter is, present where bounty hunters draw their authority from, and demonstrate how their presence today raises several significant concerns over the safety of those they pursue.

Read More